Old and new dictatorships

How many dictators will we still have to see, haranguing from the balconies of power, the dull masses of the Naziolists, before a true universal government forever prevents them from exercising a power that offends the soul of the world?

 How many Hitlers, how many Mussolins, how many Erdogan, will we still have to endure, without being able to prevent them from imprisoning dissenting politicians and the lawyers who defend them? 

 The latest, in order of time, seems to be the elected president of Turkey Recep Tayyip Erdogan, one who has imprisoned dozens of lawyers, guilty in his eyes of having defended dissenting politicians in court. The bully of Instambul now took it out on Mario Draghi, who had the courage (and perhaps also the unconsciousness, being a non-political in a strictly sense) to remove from him the mask of democratic fiction behind which he disguised himself since long time and that other politicians pretend not to see, in the name of diplomacy, business and politics.

 The diatribe between Mario Draghi and the Turkish president starts from the recent "sofagate", the diplomatic incident involving the Turkish ceremonial, which saw Ursula Von der Layen, president of the EU Commission, deprived of the diplomatic chair that was due to her (perhaps more as a woman than as chief of the executive of the European Union) and on which the president of the European Council

Charles Michel, has instead slammed! 

 But that's just the finger! The moon, or rather the real question that lies behind this apparently trivial motivation, is the exit from the Istanbul Convention, already signed by Turkey in 2011, from which Erdogan wanted to call himself out, worried that international norms they could force him to respect those human rights that he refuses to acknowledge even to men; and even less to  women, mercilessly imprisoned, even if they perform defense functions in court as lawyers! 

 And here it  comes to the focal point of this post. 

The only way to stop these dictators of whom we've really had enough,  would be to set up a world government that abolishes by law all naziolisms, discrimination and the thirst for power that are the common denominators of every and each  dictator, since  the existing world! 

 I know it won't be easy! 

But must we wait for an alien's invasion in order to unite in an international coalition that recognizes the right to exist for all peoples? Or should we wait for the ongoing third world war to finish destroying the earth?

You may also say I'm a dreamer, again; but dreams and words are the only arms I have to make my thought spread!

The supremacy of law

It has not been a surprise the Supreme Court vote on the Brexit affair. At least for those who know the long, noble history of both English legislative and Judicial powers. 

On the other end we all know that between the legislative power (the Parliament) and the executive power (id est the Governement) the first is higher.

The law is to uphold over ministers.

Legally and logically: if the Parliament has delivered the entry of Great Britain in the EU, how could the Governement only think to ride the Country out of it without consulting the Parliament?

Someone may say that the Electorate is much more worth than the same Members of Parliament (who eventually are elected by the Electorate). But in this sick democracy we are liveing  in I'm not sure the Electorate is really free in his thoughts.

I'm thinking, for instance, of press and television's power. 

Papers and television are able to influence the Electorate more than we might think.

And I'm not sure either that another vote, today, would see the Brexit's prevail.

Of course I know that the televisions and the papers are part of the society and if people believe on what they write and say that makes democracy going on.

But let me please rebut that if ten people are able to make twenty millions of electors to think as they want the, to think, then we are not living in a democracy (we are live in a plutocracy or in a mediocracy).

And let me please say another thing: I'm very worried about this secret or evident powers, as far as they in a certain way are allowing politicians dealmakers and warmongers to rule the world who knows where about (I hope they won't lead us in the brink of a precipice).

And for the memory of Jo Cox (and for her bllod spread for European Unity) I hope the British Parliament will reconsider at least the importance of the    single market, the customs union and free movements of goods and people all over Europe (including all the Great Britain).

I respect the will of  the majority of British people, as expressed in the referendum of last June, but I wanted all Britons great with the other Europeans (Italians, French, Germans, Spanish) and not with the NorthAmericans (though I feel sentiments of friendship even with the Americans).

And I don't want see the Europeans making war with each other like in the past.

The Italian Elections' Winner

Expert analysis on TV and on the Web abound, seasoned with endless displays of data: aggregates, disaggregated compounds, compared, projected, filmed and relayed and so on, and so forth.The question, however, in the end,  is only one:  who are the winners?

The question also  includes and involves a central matter: Supposed that is Beppe Grillo's 5 Stars Movement the winnwer, who really are the President Grillo's men?Yet the answer to this fundamental question, that experts can not or do not want to see, is very simple: take the votes lost by the Democratic Party, by the Berlusconi's  Party, by the Northern League and by  the Communists and you'll get exactly the percentage representation of this great result made by the  Grillo's people ( we call them "Grillini" hencefor).Go to any site, take any newspaper and  do this reckoning I have suggested;  the result can change by a few decimal but the essence is that M5S have  intercepted all unhappy voters in Italy.They are nothing more than the Italians tired of being exposed  to the arrogance and privileges of caste; they  are all former members of the Northern League, Berlusconi repentant, enlightened Communist  and DiPietro disenchanted. The Grillini are the new Italy: Italy of the old parties is now dead.I hope  not to see, from tomorrow,  on the political scene rotting skeletons, locked in a mephitic embrac , dancing surreal tangos of death.I hope instead that  some elegant man of noble sentiments, has the intelligence  and public sensitivity to invite these Grillini to dance the New Dawn Dance, on whose notes to rebuild this poor Italy plagued by a disrespectful , greedy and arrogant political caste which has so far been unable to see the tsunami that 'has overwhelmed and that threatens to engulf Italy.Best wishes to President Napolitano and  to the newly elected members of the Parliament.May  Lord guide their political action.

God Bless ItalyLong live Italy.

Where is Padania?

Very angry people assaulted yesterday a group of bikers running the "Padania's Tour".
"Padania does not exist"- they cried against the politicized bikers, all green dressed (the colour of Padania's Political Party: the Lega Party).
I personally don't know if Padania does exist or not; (because I come from the island of Sardinia, proud to be Italian and Sardish) but  I know for sure that so many people from the North of Italy are fed up with a political class very expensive, not honest and unable to govern in a dynamic and useful way.
Still remains the question: where is Padania?
There must be somewhere, if so many people claim freedom in the name of Padania!!
Furthermore: those bikers, where were going through on their tour?
Well, some say that all the north of Italy is Padania; others say only Lombardia, Piemonte and Liguria  can be defined Padania; some more say from Rome upward the very north.
I must say that padania is only in the minds of those Italian who fight against bureacracy, mafia and political corruption.
I don't agree with the Lega Party, but I think their critics are correct.

Sentenced to death

Do you remember those terrible sentences which include the final clause "'till life expires" or just "'till death comes"?
Well, once upon a time they were reserved to the worst criminals, in substitution of the capital punishment; now are bound to be applied for workers: the young ones, as matter of fact, will have to work till death comes!
In other words they will not able to afford any sort of retirement being this way forced to work for all their lives!

To read more on this
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1305844/emailArticle.html